Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| highlights:2025:itercr [2025/10/23 10:44] – Didier Barradas Bautista | highlights:2025:itercr [2025/10/23 10:48] (current) – Didier Barradas Bautista | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
| ===== Research Breakthrough ===== | ===== Research Breakthrough ===== | ||
| - | < | + | < |
| Protein–protein docking generates thousands of possible interaction models—but only a few are correct. In our latest collaborative work, we introduce Iter-CONSRANK, | Protein–protein docking generates thousands of possible interaction models—but only a few are correct. In our latest collaborative work, we introduce Iter-CONSRANK, | ||
| * 📊 Tested on two challenging datasets, Iter-CONSRANK increased the fraction of correct models by up to 8× for medium-difficulty targets and outperformed over 150 scoring functions in ranking accuracy. | * 📊 Tested on two challenging datasets, Iter-CONSRANK increased the fraction of correct models by up to 8× for medium-difficulty targets and outperformed over 150 scoring functions in ranking accuracy. | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| <fs 18> | <fs 18> | ||
| KVL's visualization scientist **Didier Barradas-Bautista** contributed significantly to the development and validation of the Iter-CONSRANK algorithm through: | KVL's visualization scientist **Didier Barradas-Bautista** contributed significantly to the development and validation of the Iter-CONSRANK algorithm through: | ||
| Line 59: | Line 62: | ||
| * Active participation in CAPRI scoring rounds, validating the method in blind tests | * Active participation in CAPRI scoring rounds, validating the method in blind tests | ||
| - | </ | ||
| </ | </ | ||